If we're fortunate -- as more and more people increasingly are throughout history -- we'll live for a long time. And we'll learn many things over this long lifetime, mostly from experience. Considering that lifetimes are so long, here are some things that I've learned from experience that are beneficial to master early on in life (say in your teens and twenties) that will compound throughout your life and increase in value exponentially.

Breaking Things Down -

Reductionism, or being able to explain or do something by reducing its complexity such as designing a bridge by analyzing each joint, is a valuable skill to master because it can be applied to so many possible avenues of life. 

• In science, mastering first principles can translate to understanding basics in other industries. For example, from physics to policy: Newton's 1st law of motion says an object in motion or at rest will continue doing what it is doing unless acted on by an outside force => the status quo will remain the status quo unless supplanted by a different idea or policy, it's not just going to improve by itself. The bigger the existing policy, the more inertia it has and the more force it's going to take to replace the policy.

• In writing and linguistics, knowing how to break words down into their root meanings can help you identify it. I took the GRE 10 years ago and again this year, and my verbal score drastically improved without direct study from just reading a lot but also from learning to break down words into their roots. For instance, the word "unequivocal"; while not hard to understand can be confused from time to time, but by knowing "un-" means 'not', "-equi-" means equal, and "-vocal" means to talk about, I can trace back the words meaning into "not being equal to talk about" or something that is unequivocal having no other equals to be talked about.

• In math, to solve a complicated multi-step problem, you're taught to solve it by breaking it down into many smaller problems that are nested and connected.

Perfecting Your Signature - 

When I was in 5th grade, a friend and I were convinced we were going to be famous baseball stars (he got a lot closer in the end by actually making the HS baseball team and eventually winning a college football championship). So naturally we needed to perfect our signatures at the age of 10. I noticed from my memorabilia that signatures were really mostly just a standout first and last letter with scribbles in between. So I created, through much practice I might add, a signature with a C-y J-l. Little did I know some 20 plus years later that creating a simple and efficient signature early on would help me easily sign things thousands of times since then, with many more to come.

Simple Math Skills -

Learning basic multiplication examples (20 times a number is just doubling it and adding a zero at the end, 1 through 12 times 1 through 12, the 20% trick when tipping as a baseline, etc.) is useful many times throughout your life. And while we'll always have calculators at our disposal, simple mental calcs are incredibly useful and time-saving. One of the most important things to master is rounding and estimating -- it's a simple skill and "just good enough" but used more than finding exact answers by orders of magnitude in everyday life. Other topics that have outsize influence on your life include exponential growth and decay, rates of change, basic statistics, etc.

Taxes -

The earlier that you understand the basics of how taxes work (income tax rate brackets, short-term vs. long-term gains, write-offs, etc.), the earlier you can maximize your benefits of the tax system in your career, which should compound in both monetary and knowledge value throughout your life.

Improving at Driving - 

Oh man, driving. Driving is one of the most mundane yet dangerous things that we do. And yet, many drivers don't consciously try to improve their driving after becoming comfortable with the skill in their teen years. For me, it took a couple near misses or mistakes to convince me to try and improve. I think the biggest thing that I've improved on is being a proactive driver instead of a reactive one -- not looking at the car in front of me but through it to the car in front of them, anticipating the the car to your front right or left that leveled off their speed to match yours and the car in front of you and will cut you off, even walking I'll wait the extra second before crossing because I've almost been hit multiple times since drivers forget right-of-way rules. Improving at driving from your teen years through your first 10-15 years of driving will pay off in a safer experience, less money wasted on accidents, repairs, and insurance, and will reduce the stress of driving throughout your life.

Establishing a Regular Exercise Routine -

Establishing a regular exercise regimen in your life is one of the best things you can do for your physical (and mental) well-being. Most people concentrate on absolutes (I want to lose X pounds or be able to lift Y weight), but by focusing on relative values (I weigh X pounds more or less than yesterday, it's because of these things, or I was able to lift Y more or less weight for these factors) is more important. But the most important thing to do in be consistent, as this will push you through the hard times that you will inevitably encounter in your exercise program. Just be consistent. As James Clear says, the heaviest weight in the gym is the front door.

Understanding Nutrition and Getting Good at Cooking -

Fad diets will always come and go, but establishing a baseline nutrition guide is crucial to your long-term health. Almost as important, and much more enjoyable, is getting good at cooking early on in your adult life. Over your twenties you should master the basics of cooking and then from there you can improve at will. But knowing how to cook good scrambled eggs or how to make a steak medium rare versus medium will never go out of fashion. Plus the better you get at it earlier, the more fun cooking becomes and the more you'll want to do it versus eating out, thus saving you a lot of money in the long run.

Understanding Your Personality Traits -

There are arguments for and against personality tests. They're pretty much useless when it comes to predicting how different people will work together in teams and what not. However, I believe they do hold a lot of value in describing parts of your personality that maybe you couldn't put into words before (provided you got regular results on the tests over time, which is debatable). Unlike astrology where the root of the argument is basically when your parents had sex and conceived you determines your personality, tests like the Big 5 or Myers-Briggs should be taken with a grain of salt but can explain things that others similar in personality to you have found helpful. To me, when I first discovered them 8-10 years ago, it was like a light bulb went off and has influenced my thinking every day since then.

Determining they're, their, there; to, too, two; who's, whose; etc. -

These mistakes are way too common in everyday life to neglect and never improve on. For me, I always do a double check to make sure I used the correct one when using similar sounding words (although I definitely still miss some). Really it just takes conscious practice and review to improve. It took me way too long to properly use "who's" versus "whose", but an easy tip is "who's" can be answer by he/she/them and "whose" by his/hers/theirs.

Improving Your Typing Speed - 

I remember hating that I was signed up for a semester long typing course early on in high school. I had been able to type via pick and choose and looking at the keyboard, was this class really necessary? One could argue it has been one of the most beneficial classes that I took in high school or ever, in terms of practicality and amount of time saved throughout my life thus far. Learn to type properly early on, even if it is slower in the short-term, because the benefits will compound over time to be massive in the long-term.

Writing Your Thoughts Regularly -

I hated writing in school, with a passion. Only recently have I seen the benefits of what writing can do to clarify your thinking. One of the best things you can do early on, similar to an exercise or nutrition program, is establish a regular program of writing your thoughts down. It can be in your phone's notes, in a journal or diary, or a public blog. But writing is so very helpful to thinking and communicating clearly that this regular program will have invaluable returns throughout your life.

Communicating Clearly Electronically -

When we communicate with others and are not face-to-face, we miss out on all the non-verbal cues that make up effective human communication. So when responding to emails or texts, it's best to be clear and concise. This is more important in professional settings, as miscommunications can have time and money repercussions along with relationships. One of the best tips I've learned is getting to the point early in the communication. For example, when sending a well thought out email, bullet point highlight the two to three most important things in the email at the top, so their importance isn't lost in the body of text. Use bold and highlight to also show importance. These tips go a long way in providing direct and clear communication.

Using a Calendar and its Reminders for Future Events -

Time management is such a crucial skill to learn early on. One of the best things you can start doing is inputting future events into your phone's calendar and setting reminders for them for a couple hours or days before. When my life was busiest, if something wasn't added to my calendar than I missed it, as I didn't have the mental capacity to remember when events were supposed to happen. Agree to a lunch with a coworker tomorrow? Set an event for it tomorrow and a reminder in the morning. Set a recurring reminder to call your mom and dad every week. Electric bill due on the 15th? Set a reminder to pay it on the 12th. It seems women intuitively get this as a lot of them that take birth control have a regular reminder alarm that goes off at the same time every day.

Getting the Right Timing -

Very related to the above topic, and something I plan on delving much deeper into in a longer blog post, is the importance of timing. Whether it's relationships, job changes, sports, entertainment, etc. almost everything in this world is highly dependent on timing. You meet someone great but are in a happy relationship, so you stay friends. But had your relationship been in another state or you met the other person at a different time, things could be drastically different. When it comes to acting on those reminders mentioned above, timing becomes so much more crucial. Notice when I mentioned setting the reminder about lunch with your coworker for the morning, so that way you won't pack a lunch that day. Or setting the bill reminder for a couple days before, because if it pops up and you're not able to act on it immediately, you can snooze until tomorrow and still pay it on time. For me, I've been setting reminders to go off at times when I think I will be able to act on them, so I set bill payments for at night when I'll be home and near my computer rather than during the day when I'm out and about. Don't send tweets or messages late at night if your goal is to get the most eyeballs on it, as most won't check their feed the next morning to see all that they missed while sleeping.

I'm a big fan of the blog Priceonomics and I posted four years ago about one of their data visualizations where they look at how diverse major U.S. cities are using a metric that was new to me at the time, the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index or HHI. HHI looks at how evenly groups are represented among a market, and it's a really simple formula. You just sum the square of each group's market share as a percent, so an evenly distributed market would have a value of 1/(number of groups) and a complete monopoly by one group would have a value of 1. 

In the case a market has four groups, a perfectly diverse market would be: 

(0.25)^2+(0.25)^2+(0.25)^2+(0.25)^2 = 0.25

and a complete monopoly by any one group would be:

(1.00)^2+(0)^2+(0)^2+(0)^2 = 1

Since I've been playing around with College Scorecard and IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) college data recently, I thought it'd be cool to apply the same HHI method to each state's flagship university. The thinking is each flagship university is likely one of the most diverse colleges in that state, and is probably a good reflection of that state's diversity as well. So if I could find a HHI score for each state and each flagship university, I should not only be able to compare flagships to one another to see which are the most/least diverse, but also should be able to compare which states' flagship universities are more/less diverse than that of the state's population. Lastly I should be able to run a simple linear regression to see how good a prediction of a flagship's diversity just its state's diversity is.

**Disclaimer: I normalized the market share of each racial group across these five groups: White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American/Pacific Islander. This means I am not considering any student that identified as: two or more races, non-resident alien, or unknown. I realize this is affecting the accuracy of the data -- especially not including two or more race responses -- but it was the cleanest way to compare the most prominent groups. Another note is that this research has already been done by others, including this fantastic interactive piece by Ben Myers in 2016 and this Hechinger report from earlier in 2018**

Let's start with the rankings of each state's flagship university, from most diverse to least diverse (perfectly diverse among 5 groups = 0.2, complete monopoly by any one group = 1):

Generally, the greater the population of White students the less diverse that university is; this isn't a surprise. What I did find surprising is just how White some schools (and their respective states) are. Seeing it as a percent is one thing, visualizing that on a bar graph really puts feeling behind that number. This is why I love good charts or data visualizations: they pack a feeling of scale or proportion that numbers can just never achieve. [Again keep in mind that I normalized the actual percentages across the five groups, so each group's actual percentage is smaller than it appears -- however their proportions to each other remained the same]

Another cool thing with the above graph is it visually identifies "sister schools", or schools where their populations are roughly the same proportions (via the scientific "squint and see which colors are about equal" method). Theoretically, you could Truman Show-someone: switch every other student at their school with the other school's population (save for a few close friends or familiar faces) and that student would never know the difference. However, that student would notice the difference if the student population of Rutgers (NJ) was replaced with that of New Hampshire. Completely useless, but a fun thought experiment. 

Looking at this data leads to a whole other discussion about how we stereotype certain schools based on their populations; for instance, I'm not at all surprised that UNC and UVA have similar populations since they're bordering states, but I am surprised that UCONN has a very similar population mix.

Another case: it makes sense that ND and SD's flagships have nearly identical populations or that VT/NH/ME all are very similar, but ND/SD also are extremely similar to VT/NH/ME.

Last one of these, but even though they are on opposite coasts of the U.S., the University of Florida and the University of Arizona have very similar populations.

Most of the time these schools have very close HHI scores (meaning they are similarly diverse, sorry for pointing out the obvious) but interestingly there are cases when another school will slip in between with very different proportions. This is interesting since technically that school that in between (B) is closer in diversity to the top school (A) than the bottom school (C) yet the top and bottom (A & C) schools have much more similar student populations. For instance, the universities of Delaware and Kansas have very similar populations, but technically Minnesota and Mississippi are more similar in diversity to Delaware than Kansas even though Kansas' population is more similar.

I think there could be an economic principle buried in this closer-but-not-as-close oddity and the Truman Show-style thought experiment above but that's for another time.

Anyways... now let's look at how each flagship university's diversity compares with their corresponding state's diversity. The schools at the top of the diagram below are MORE diverse than their respective states, the ones on bottom are LESS diverse than their state. [Note: State population figures have been normalized across the same five racial groups, again disregarding responses of two or more races or unknown, for comparison purposes]

As you can see, most flagships are not as diverse as their respective state's population. This is somewhat surprising to me, as I would've guess it'd be more of a 50-50 spit for some reason. In general, schools in the South (SEC football conference) need to do a MUCH better job at making their student population more reflective of their state's diversity. And WTF Delaware??

Finally, let's test my theory that a state's diversity is a pretty good predictor of that state's flagship university's diversity. To do so, I'm going to see how correlated the state and flagship's HHI scores are. Plotting them on a scatter plot (with college.hhi depending on state.hhi) and finding the linear trendline and corresponding R-squared should do the trick.

As expected, they're highly correlated, with an R-squared of nearly 0.77. You can essentially read this number as "A state's diversity score explains nearly 77% of that state's flagship university's diversity score". Even if it explained 100%, it doesn't mean that each group's proportion to one another is the same at the flagship as the state, but the overall diversity of the population market is equal. Again, not entirely useful, but interesting nonetheless. 

That's it, a quick look at how diverse each state's flagship university is. I'm attaching a publicly available version of the data I collected on this Google Sheet. I got the school's demographic data from College Scorecard (download link fyi), the state's data from U.S. Census estimates in 2017, and a list of flagship university per state by just Googling it.

Howard Schnellenberger coined the phrase "The State of Miami" to refer to the wealth of talent in South Florida, from Orlando to the Keys basically. The thinking then (and now) was that all that the University of Miami had to concentrate on was recruiting football players from this area and they'd be good enough to field a championship team. And that's right for the most part.

Players from The State of Miami have been some of the greatest to ever play the game; NFL and college Hall of Famers and Pro Bowlers and first round picks. And they're continuing to do it, just not always at Miami [See: Jerry Jeudy]. Players from South FL are just different: they're hungrier, scrappier, and overall angrier not to mention faster and more agile. They play with a special kind of confidence, a swagger if you will, that is undeniable and feeds off of itself. This makes the same players that are some of the fastest and toughest in the world start to play faster and tougher -- they start to bring that extra oomph with every single hit and block -- and they sure let you know about it. Which only feeds into it more and the feedback loop becomes self-reinforcing. [See: Miami's beatdown of ND one year ago or the impact of the Turnover Chain]

But the problem with this style of play is when it tries to be something it's not -- when it tries to be slow, methodical, and precise instead of fast and loose and intuitive -- the self-reinforcing loop switches from positive to negative and the level of play implodes. That's how you can have world-class football players, players that are a lot more talented than opponents they're lining up across from (no offense UVA, BC, and Duke - you guys kicked our butts but with objectively less talented players) just look lifeless and directionless.

This is not to say that Miami is lifeless or directionless at all, but they look like they are. And if you were again objectively looking at the current state of Miami, you have to start with the man at the top.

Coach Mark Richt (CMR) has been around the game of college football longer than I have been alive and he's forgotten more than most fans could ever hope to learn. But fans of the Canes and football alike can still analyze a team with less football and inside information and be more right than those on the inside. And it's not personal; everybody sometimes lose sight of the forest through the trees, it's impossible not to. Here are the good and bad things CMR brings to the Canes as the man in charge.

Good:

Loyalty - CMR is one of the most loyal people in all of college football. He showed it by being at UGA for 15 years, for continuing to support Bulldog causes even as Miami coach (which is great), and for being loyal to assistants and seeing them grow under him. He's also very loyal to offensive schemes which is a good thing as you have a record of a coherent philosophy that you can point to and always refer back to. I mean the man donated a million dollars to his employer and alma mater to build the new indoor practice facility. I call it "The House that Richt Built".

Stability - If you're loyal to teams and people and philosophies, one of the benefits you'll see is stability. People love consistency even if they won't outright admit it. One of my old bosses put it best when he said people don't get mad at poor performance they get mad at inconsistency because if you always perform poorly or are always late, people know what to expect and can react accordingly. I can fire you if I know you'll always be a bad worker or if we're friends and you're always late, I can tell you an earlier time and plan on you showing up late. But if it's when we're inconsistent that people get really mad at. And CMR is an extremely consistent person (except for his flip-flopping of QBs this year although I heard he did that late in his career at UGA). You know what to expect from him, you know he'll always remain calm and promote a stable environment to the team during games -- that's why his outbursts and grabbing an official last year or him telling his whole Bulldog team to celebrate on the field against Florida receive so much attention, because they're out of character for him. So the stability that Richt brings to the Canes is great, especially if he can be at Miami for 15 years as well.

Precision - If you've ever heard CMR go deep into the things that he concentrates on with teaching QBs, it's precision he covets. Always making the right read or decision is paramount to him because he loves consistency. Making a great throw isn't good enough, the ball needs to be perfectly numbers-high and 12 inches from the chest or something. When the offense is always making the right reads and running the right routes and blocking the right people, CMR's offense is unstoppable because of its optionality and answer for everything a defense tries to do to it. There's no answer for it.

Organization - CMR is a very organized person which makes sense since he loves stable systems that are precise. He'd be a fantastic manufacturing floor manager or would have gotten his Six Sigma certification in another life. I still think his greatest contribution to the Miami program (besides the point mentioned below about the defense) was bringing in a SEC-caliber organized recruiting operation. He has been recruiting at a high level for decades and he knows how to run an efficient football recruiting system. Along with Matt Doherty who runs the recruiting department and his tireless assistants, CMR's organization definitely bumped up Miami's recruiting [See: Paradise Camp]

Intelligence - Like I said before, CMR has been around football for a very long time. He's one of the smartest people in the business and has seen it all. The other greatest contribution that CMR has brought to the Canes was the intelligence to adapt Miami's defense to a style of play that it had shown to be successful in the past and that perfectly suited the type of defender that the State of Miami produced -- a fast and aggressive defense (I wrote about this in 2014 arguing for them to move to a 4-2-5 defense to take advantage of South FL players which Miami has done with the Striker position). Manny Diaz was the perfect hire to run Miami's defense and they have shown what removing barriers of forcing them into schemes that didn't fit their talents [See: Al Golden's 3-4 defense] and letting them play fast and intuitive can do for a team. This was absolutely the right call by CMR when he came to Miami and was very smart.

Values - CMR is a man of values. He's talked at length about the importance that strong Christian values have had on his life and has consistently demonstrated this with his and his team's actions in the community. I'm not saying the Canes didn't have values before he arrived, but everyone in the college football world knows and raves about CMR's values.

Family - CMR is a family man and fits the tight family atmosphere of the Miami Hurricanes football program perfectly -- because he is a Miami Hurricane! It's fantastic to have a Cane coaching the Canes, and promoting the family atmosphere of the Canes with former players as well has been a great decision. That's one thing that sets the Canes football program apart from others, it's a family.

(photo via Getty Images)

Now it's time to talk about some bad things that CMR brings to the Canes as the man in charge:

Loyalty - It's no secret that CMR is loyal to a fault when it comes to moving on from his assistants and upgrading. This has hurt him many times in the past at UGA and is hurting him now at Miami

Stability - Sometimes CMR is too stable as opponents know exactly what to expect as he'll stick with the same plays over and over again, something he has been proud to admit in the past. Or he's too stable in that he doesn't use his emotions for good in reacting during the game, as a calm presence isn't always advisable in every situation. Teams need consistent environments to thrive but when an opponent is taking advantage of your stability, it pays to be unstable.

Precision - CMR's offense runs on precision but when the precision isn't there, it self implodes [See: 14, 13, and 12 points against UVA, BC, and Duke]. When CMR has a QB that can make the right reads AND the precise throws, the offense piles on the points [See: Matt Stafford, Kaaya and Rosier's multi-game stretches]. BUT focusing on precision isn't always the best thing to do. I can make the argument that Miami plays it's optimal offense when it is playing fast and loose and intuitive -- think backyard football or the 7-on-7 teams from South FL that dominate national competitions -- similar to how the Miami defense is currently thriving! We have too much speed and agility on the outside to continue to run a slow and methodical and precise offense. This is what fans mean when they say they want CMR to bring in a new playcaller - someone that will bring a pass-happy spread the field offense that takes advantage of speed. There will be more mistakes in this type of offense than in the current precise system, but the advantages will vastly outweigh the mistakes. When you're throwing the ball to speedy receivers  more than 20-30 times a game (which we have seen recently) you're going to have more turnovers but you're also going to have much more explosive plays and touchdowns. And since touchdowns have more expected points than turnovers (because the other team might not score), there's a rational argument for throwing the ball much more with Miami's offensive talent. This includes continuing to take advantage of your dynamic RBs with designed throws to them besides flat routes [See: Washington St., Oklahoma, and the LA Rams].

Family - This goes back to loyalty, but I think any reasonable person would conclude that CMR has hurt this team by having his son as QB coach. We all want the best for our family but if CMR really believes his son would be a QB coach at a similar program of Miami's caliber then he's blinded by nepotism. I understand CMR is the de facto QB coach but something's not working. It would be a slap in the face to every Miami assistant if CMR fired other assistants this off-season but kept his son as QB coach.

(photo via Matthew Emmons)

As you can see, Mark Richt brings a lot of positive attributes to the position of head football coach. But within all of his strengths lie weaknesses, just like in every other human. The current problem for CMR and the Miami football program is the weaknesses are outweighing the strengths right now. Forcing Miami's offense to be something that it is not is taking away some of its greatest advantages. Even Golden was able to recognize the type of offense that thrived with Miami's players when he brought in Jedd Fisch and James Coley and they ran a fast and throw-happy offense. CMR knew this with Kaaya as well but somewhere along the way the focus on precision took over and it has ground the offense to a halt. Being too loyal to bad assistants and family is hurting player recruiting and development.

The last three losses are unfortunately mostly a reflection of poor management decisions of the recent past, in both offensive scheme and player personnel. There's absolutely no excuse to have seen our (lack of) punting performance last year and go into this year without legit competition, that's completely a management decision. And it's literally losing us games due to poor field position, especially when combined with an inconsistent offense. You're giving the defense a horrible starting field position because of management decisions as play caller and special teams recruiting. To continue to defend the punter's practice performance is laughable when we have many games worth of film. Cut losses and move on but continuing to actively hurt your team and not making a plan to fix it in any other industry would be a fireable offence. That's what our punting has become, especially when combined with an offense that is inconsistent and punts frequently!

Overall I still think Mark Richt is the man for the job and will lead the Miami program back to greatness. But this feels like a critical adapt or die moment in his tenure. He can continue to be loyal to his scheme and assistants or he can draw on decades of football intelligence and realize that something needs to change. It's a hard pill to swallow for someone that professed how important running things himself was when he came to Miami. But it feels like the best path to greatness is to highlight his strengths as a program CEO - to be the stable organized force on top and lead these young men with your attention to detail and values. But look at the offense the same way you did with the defense and evaluate the players and talent pool's strengths and play fast and aggressive. Step back and let someone bring new life and energy into the offense. Step back and take an objective look at the current state of Miami.

As I have dived deep into the world of college access research over the last couple of months, I've noticed many researchers appear again and again across various higher ed topics (such as financial aid, college choice, and completion) with co-authors from different universities and across many different academic departments.

I thought it would be cool to see how these researchers are all connected; since even though 2nd or 3rd degree connections didn't directly work together, their ideas and co-author experiences were shared somewhat. And I hoped to identify some great researchers/universities doing some kick-ass work.

Above is that initial network graph of paper co-authors. Ideally I'd do this with citations but co-authors was an easier start. This shows which researchers published papers with one another. The bigger, bolder researchers are more connected across disciplines and topics.

Here's the basic process I used: 

1. copy-paste from Google Scholar into Excel
2. clean the data through formatting formulas (about 3400 papers)
3. narrow down papers by title, keeping only those related to higher ed (about 1000 papers)
4. format co-authors (nodes) to establish separate connections (edges) for each shared paper
5. create a simple Gephi graph (this was my first one)
6. cluster/organize the layout by Force Atlas
7. filter out authors with less than 3 connections (it cleaned it up nicely)
8. size the nodes by betweeness centrality
9. partition and color the nodes by modularity class

From June 22 - September 22:

Smino - Anita

Khalid & Normani - Love Lies (Medasin Remix)

Apre - All Yours

Drake - In My Feelings

Jerry Folk - Sweetness On My Tongue

La Felix - Comes & Goes

Koresma - Turquoise

The Carters - Apeshit

Maribou State - Nervous Tics (Feat. Holly Walker)

Emotional Oranges - Personal

SACRE - Lovesick (Mura Masa Cover)

Channel Tres - Topdown

Bronze Whale - One

Breathe – Are you All Good?

Slenderbodies - Toxic (Britney Spears Cover)